A COMPARATIVE ANALIYSIS OF SYMBOLISM IN EUROPEAN AND ASIAN LITERATURE.
Keywords:
Keywords: Symbolism, European literature, Asian literature, comparative analysis, cultural influence, religious symbolism, philosophical traditions.Abstract
Abstract: Symbolism is a universal literary tool that transcends cultural boundaries, offering insight into the human experience through metaphor and allegory. This paper explores the similarities and differences in the use of symbolism in European and Asian literature, focusing on how cultural, religious, and philosophical contexts shape symbolic expression. While both traditions employ universal themes such as love, mortality, and nature, they diverge in their philosophical foundations. European literature often draws on Christian and Greco-Roman influences, emphasizing individualism and dualism. In contrast, Asian literature, influenced by Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism, prioritizes harmony and interconnectedness. This comparative study highlights the richness of symbolic traditions in global literature, fostering cross-cultural understanding.
References
REFERENCES:
Damrosch, David.(2003) What Is World Literature? Princeton University Press,
Eliot, T. S.(1919) Tradition and the Individual Talent. The Egoist.
Lin, Yutang.(1937) The Importance of Living. William Morrow.
Mitchell, Stephen.(1984)The Selected Poetry of Rainer Maria Rilke. Vintage.
Waley Arthur.(1946) Chinese Poems. George Allen & Unwin.
“Symbolism in Literature: Definition and Examples.” Literary Devices. https://literarydevices.net/symbolism/
“Symbolism in European and Asian Literature.” Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/
“Cultural Influence on Symbolism in Literature.” Study.com. https://study.com/
